How we measure
Version 1.2.0, updated 18 September 2026. Public name of the score: Structural Verification Index. Every number on this site can be recomputed from the published data and the rules on this page: the engine reads the same file this page is rendered from.
What we check — and what we do not
We check structural trust facts against official public registers: who the responsible physician is, what certification and licence the registers confirm, whether the facility and the legal entity can be traced, whether the clinic discloses its own identifiers, whether its advertising is honest, whether its language fronts agree, and whether patient documents are published.
We do not assess outcomes, skill or complications. A high score means the clinic is well verified, not that treatment there is right for you. This is not medical advice.
The unit
One record = one clinic in this country: brand + address + responsible physician. The named physician is the load-bearing field — every register check is by name. Procedure segment and city are facets, not units.
Inclusion policy
Four mechanical conditions. The first three decide whether a clinic is listed; the fourth whether it can be scored.
- Identifiable: a live public surface and a working in-country contact on the check date.
- Provides the service itself: not an aggregator, booking site, affiliate or tour packager.
- In scope: the intervention is performed by a physician — plastic or aesthetic surgery, hair transplant, physician-led injectables or device treatments, medical weight loss. Out: salons, barbers, nails/brows/lashes, spas, med-spas without a named physician.
- Names a responsible physician. Otherwise the record is verification unavailable: it is not scored and not shown until a physician is named. Unknown is not fault — a missing name is a statement about coverage, not an accusation.
Country register map
The map for Morocco was compiled 31 August 2026, before any clinic research. A class marked as absent makes its axis not applicable; a register that cannot be scripted leaves its axis cells as 'could not verify', without penalty. We never simulate a register.
| Specialist board register | Tableau de l’Ordre national des médecins (CNOM Maroc) — inscription et qualification de spécialiste, plateforme réservée aux médecins inscrits (login required) |
|---|---|
| Medical licence register | Tableau de l'Ordre national des médecins (CNOM Maroc) — plateforme numérique, accès réservé aux médecins inscrits (login required) |
| Facility register | no public register of this class in this country |
| Company register | Registre central du commerce (OMPIC) — recherche publique Directinfo : dénomination, n° RC, ICE, forme juridique, état (open, machine-readable) |
| Sanctions / discipline register | no public register of this class in this country |
| Foreign-patient register | no public register of this class in this country |
The nine axes
Every axis is a fact or a quote from a public source, scored 1–5 against a fixed rubric. There are no editorial axes. Each cell carries its sources, its source class (official register / secondary) and its check date.
Fame, review volume, domain age and social-media following are scored nowhere.
M1 · Specialist certification of the responsible physician — weight 26
Whether the physician named as responsible for this clinic is found in the country's specialist board register with a current specialisation matching the advertised segment (plastic surgery or dermatology, by segment).
Register class: Specialist board register — Tableau de l’Ordre national des médecins (CNOM Maroc) — inscription et qualification de spécialiste, plateforme réservée aux médecins inscrits.
| Value | Anchor |
|---|---|
| 5 | Found by name or number; specialty matches what is advertised; status current. |
| 4 | Found; specialty adjacent to what is advertised (noted on the profile). |
| 3 | Found in the register; the register does not disclose specialty. |
| 2 | Only a secondary source (association, aggregator) supports the certification. |
| 1 | The register contradicts the claim: the physician's record is found but the status is not current (suspended, revoked, expired) or the registered specialty is unrelated to what is advertised. A record that is simply not found is 'queried, no match', never this value. |
M2 · Identifiability of the responsible physician — weight 16
Whether a patient can name the specific physician and their role before making contact, and whether that physician is tied to this location.
| Value | Anchor |
|---|---|
| 5 | Physician(s) named with role and tied to this address. |
| 4 | Named; role unclear. |
| 3 | A name appears in only one place on the site. |
| 2 | Surname or initials without a full name. |
| 1 | 'Our team' only — this is the gate state 'verification unavailable'. |
M3 · Basic medical licence — weight 8
Whether the responsible physician's registration is found in the country's medical licence register.
Register class: Medical licence register — Tableau de l'Ordre national des médecins (CNOM Maroc) — plateforme numérique, accès réservé aux médecins inscrits.
| Value | Anchor |
|---|---|
| 5 | Matched by licence number. |
| 4 | Matched by name. |
| 3 | Register not machine-accessible; the clinic publishes the number. |
| 2 | Licence claimed without a number. |
| 1 | Public data contradicts the claim. |
M4 · Facility registration — weight 10
Whether the operating location is found in the facility register (where the country has one; otherwise this axis is not applicable). A register that exists but returns no record leaves the cell empty — we never claim 'unlicensed'.
Register class: Facility register — none in this country, so this axis is not applicable here.
| Value | Anchor |
|---|---|
| 5 | Record found: name, address and status match. |
| 4 | Record found with a spelling discrepancy. |
| 3 | Register not machine-accessible; the clinic itself publishes its facility registration number. |
| 2 | Only the clinic's own statement. |
| 1 | A published registration number is contradicted by the register (verified false → flag). |
M5 · Legal-entity traceability — weight 8
Who is legally responsible: a legal entity in the company register, tied to the brand and the address.
Register class: Company register — Registre central du commerce (OMPIC) — recherche publique Directinfo : dénomination, n° RC, ICE, forme juridique, état.
| Value | Anchor |
|---|---|
| 5 | Legal entity and registration number published and matched in the register. |
| 4 | Matched by name. |
| 3 | Legal entity named; register not accessible. |
| 2 | Brand only. |
| 1 | The register contradicts the legal entity the clinic names: no such number, entity dissolved, or the number belongs to someone else (verified conflict → hold H2). An entity that is simply not found is 'queried, no match', never this value. |
M6 · Self-disclosure of identifiers — weight 10
Whether the clinic itself publishes the numbers needed to re-check it (licences, certificates with issuer). Disclosure is rewarded; a missing number is not a missing licence.
| Value | Anchor |
|---|---|
| 5 | All load-bearing numbers published with issuers. |
| 4 | Physician numbers published; facility or legal-entity numbers not. |
| 3 | Partial, without issuers. |
| 2 | Logos without numbers. |
| 1 | No identifiers at all. |
M7 · Advertising honesty — weight 12
A machine profile of the clinic’s own claims: outcome guarantees, ‘100% safe’, ‘No. 1’ or ‘best’ without an issuer, ‘unlimited grafts’, before/after presented as a promise, foreign boards presented as the national specialist board. Every deduction cites an exact quote with URL, locale and date.
| Value | Anchor |
|---|---|
| 5 | No pattern from the lexicon found. |
| 4 | One or two soft superlatives. |
| 3 | Systematic superlatives without guarantees. |
| 2 | Guarantee or ‘100%’-class statement (bright line; cap candidate). |
| 1 | Verified fake credential (flag + cap). |
M8 · Cross-locale consistency — weight 5
Whether facts agree across the language fronts of the clinic's own site (physician, numbers, accreditations) — a mechanical comparison of extracted fields.
| Value | Anchor |
|---|---|
| 5 | All load-bearing fields agree. |
| 4 | Spelling discrepancies. |
| 3 | Some facts appear on only one front. |
| 2 | A load-bearing fact (physician or number) differs. |
| 1 | Fronts contradict each other on credentials (H2 candidate). |
M9 · Patient documents — weight 5
Presence check for five document classes: informed consent, risks/contraindications, aftercare, revision policy, complaint route. Presence only — the quality of the documents is not assessed.
| Value | Anchor |
|---|---|
| 5 | All five classes published. |
| 4 | Four. |
| 3 | Two or three. |
| 2 | One. |
| 1 | None. |
The formula
Each axis value 1–5 is mapped to 0–1. The composite is the weighted average over the axes that hold a value: axes that are not applicable in this country, axes whose register is closed to machine queries and axes we could not verify drop out of the normalisation.
composite = 100 × Σ(weight × (value − 1) / 4) / Σ(weight of axes with a value) score = min(composite + focus adjustment, lowest active ceiling), clamped to 0…100
Coverage threshold: a score is published only when at least 75% of the axis weight that can be measured in this country holds a sourced value. A register class the country does not publish, or one that refuses machine queries (the refusal is on record in the register map), is left out of that denominator; a completed query with no match, an attempt that did not complete and a single language front count against coverage. Below the threshold the record is verification pending: it carries no score and is not shown until the next collection pass lifts it above the threshold.
We publish only clinics we could verify against the registers; a clinic without a published score is not shown anywhere on this site.
Focus adjustment
A mechanical classification from the clinic's own menu.
| Focus | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| specialist | 0 |
| aesthetic in general clinic | -2 |
| spa or salon addon | -5 |
Score ceilings
A ceiling is applied only from a verified-false finding — never from 'not found'. Each ceiling is rendered from a fixed template with the exact quote or register entry and its URL; no free text is written about a named clinic.
| Ceiling | Max score | What triggers it | Fixed wording |
|---|---|---|---|
| Verified false accreditation or licence claim | 45 | A claimed accreditation, board certification or licence is contradicted by the official register. Never applied on 'not found' alone. | The register {registry} (record dated {date}) does not confirm the credential claimed at {url}: “{quote}”. Under this methodology the score is capped at {cap}. The clinic has been offered a right of reply. |
| Outcome guarantee or ‘100% safe’-class statement | 65 | The clinic's own published text guarantees a result or absolute safety. Applied only with the exact quote. | The clinic's own page {url} ({locale}, {date}) states: “{quote}”. Under this methodology an outcome guarantee caps the score at {cap}. |
| Active sanction in a machine-readable official register | 45 | Exists only in countries whose registry map declares a sanctions register. Absence of a sanction is never a finding. | Entry in the {registry} register dated {date}: {url}. The score is capped at {cap} and the profile is held pending the clinic's right of reply. |
The sanctions ceiling exists only in countries with a machine-readable official sanctions register. In this country: no public register of this class in this country. Absence of a sanction is never a finding.
Holds
Positive verification by default; the hold ladder handles the cases where public records conflict or the physician cannot be identified.
| ID | Hold | Effect | Fixed wording |
|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | Clarification requested | profile provisional, no crown | A clarification has been requested from the clinic. The profile is provisional and carries no crown until it is resolved. |
| H2 | Material structural conflict | ceiling after the right-of-reply window (69), 14-day right-of-reply window | Public records show a material structural conflict ({detail}). After the right-of-reply window the score is capped at {cap}. |
| H3 | Responsible physician not identifiable | composite withheld, unranked | The responsible physician could not be identified from public sources. The composite score is withheld and the record is not published until a physician is named. |
Crowns and procedure slices
A crown is a boolean gate from register-verified axes — never from a clinic's claim. Within a crown, the order is the composite.
| Crown | Meaning | Gate |
|---|---|---|
| Specialist-led | The responsible physician holds a current, matching specialist certification in the official register (M1 = 5, official source) and is clearly identifiable (M2 ≥ 4). | M1 ≥ 5 (official register) · M2 ≥ 4 |
| Foreign-patient ready | The clinic is verified in the country's official foreign-patient register. Exists only where such a register exists. | no such register in this country — this crown does not exist here |
Procedure slices list the clinics whose own menu names the procedure (a sourced boolean), ranked by the composite:
Outcome quality
There is no independent measurement of treatment outcomes in this field, and we do not imitate one. The register facts already in the axes are the only quality-adjacent evidence we publish.
How the data is produced (unattended run)
- No score without a source — in two passes. A collector records the value, the quote and the URL; a separate verifier reloads the URL and looks for the quote by string match. If the quote is not found, the cell degrades to 'could not verify'.
- All negative wording is templated. Ceilings and holds are rendered from fixed strings plus the cited quote or register entry. Nothing free-form is written against a named clinic.
- The validator is the build gate. Every axis key must be present (null allowed, absence not), every citation must resolve, ceilings only from verified-false findings with a quote, weights must sum to 100, and superlatives in our own text fail the build.
- A checklist per record: at least two independent sources, the register map opened and cited, every axis either a sourced value or an explicit 'could not verify'.
- Right of reply without a human in the loop: messages to the contact form or corrections@ are processed as ordinary data input. A correction with a source is applied and logged; a statement without one is published next to the data and the score does not change.
Why a cell can be empty
Every cell we could not verify carries one of these reasons. Where a query was run, the record shows the register, the date and the outcome of the attempt. An attempt that did not complete is re-run in the next collection pass; it is never a finding against the clinic.
| Reason | Meaning |
|---|---|
| No register of this class in this country | The country register map declares no public register of this class; the axis is not applicable, drops out of the normalisation and is left out of the coverage denominator. |
| Register closed to machine queries | The register exists but refuses scripted queries (CAPTCHA, login, non-scriptable form); the refusal is on record in the register map and the documented secondary routes did not yield a value. Since v1.2 the axis is left out of the coverage denominator for every clinic on the site: the clinic is scored on what the country lets us check. Where the specialist register is closed, what a society or an international directory says about the physician is shown on the profile as a secondary fact outside the score. |
| Queried, no match | The register was queried and no matching entry was found. Logged with the query. Not a negative finding and never a value: a miss can be a transliteration or a legal name behind a brand. |
| Attempt not completed | The query did not complete (rate limit, timeout, quota, unreachable, or the clinic site failed to load) or was never logged. The cell is re-run in the next collection pass; it is not a final state. |
| Single language front | M8 only: the clinic site publishes one language front, or the clinic has no website on record, so there is nothing to compare. |
Freshness
Each record shows the real date of its last check. Register axes (M1, M3, M4) are rechecked within 90 days; the advertising axis (M7) within 180 days. Every change is logged in the changelog and in the record's own history.
What this register does not do
- We do not measure treatment outcomes, surgical skill or complication rates.
- We do not see clinics without a public web presence.
- Register classes this country does not publish are named as unavailable; we never simulate a register.
- We take no money from clinics, we do not book, and we do not refer.
- Fame, review volume, domain age and social-media following are not scored anywhere.
Independence: we take no money from clinics, we do not book, we do not refer, and no position can be bought. Data changes only through sourced facts, for every clinic under the same rules.
This site is an independent research project provided 'as is'. Clinic names and public information are used for identification. Nothing here creates a doctor–patient or advisory relationship.
Methodology versions
| Date | Version | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 August 2026 | v1.0.0 | Initial public methodology: nine mechanical axes (M1–M9, weights summing to 100), 1–5 rubric per axis, weighted composite normalised over axes that hold a value, 75% coverage threshold, hold ladder H1–H3, score caps only from verified-false findings, focus penalty, registry-gated crowns. |
| 17 September 2026 | v1.1.0 | Completeness of collection became a build gate. Every cell we could not verify now carries a typed reason (register absent in this country, register not machine-accessible, queried and not found, attempt not completed, single language front) and, where a query was run, the attempt log; a closed register is tried through secondary routes before a cell is left empty; cross-locale consistency (M8) is computed mechanically. Only clinics with a published score are shown; a site publishes only with at least ten scored clinics (target fifteen) and otherwise shows a holding page while collection continues. Home title, heading and description name the country and are built from the site’s own data. Weights, rubrics, the coverage threshold, ceilings and holds are unchanged. |
| 18 September 2026 | v1.2.0 | Coverage is measured against what the country lets us check: a register class that does not exist here or is closed to machine queries (with the refusal on record) leaves the coverage denominator; a completed query with no match, an attempt that did not complete and a single language front stay in it. A register miss is never a value: the three anchors that used to encode a miss (M1 = 1, M4 = 3, M5 = 1) now mean a found record that contradicts the claim, or, for M4 = 3, a register that is not machine-accessible while the clinic publishes its facility number. Where the specialist register is closed, M1 is not scored on that site at all; what a society, ISAPS or a hospital page says is shown on the profile as a secondary fact outside the score. Commercial mirrors of an official register can support M3–M5 up to 4 with secondary provenance. M8 may be empty only for a single language front or while the clinic site fails to load. The citation verifier applies exactly three normalisations (HTML entities, Unicode NFC, whitespace). Weights, rubrics otherwise, the 75% coverage threshold, ceilings, holds and the ten-clinic floor are unchanged. |